Table 3 The association of adherence to DASH diet with odds of metabolic syndrome and it’s components in the studied adolescents1

MetS

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.92(0.28–3.03)

0. 90

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.78(0.22–2.74)

0.69

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.61(0.15–2.45)

0.49

Obesity

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.84(0.48–1.46)

0.53

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.83(0.47–1.43)

0.54

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.79(0.42–1.46)

0.45

TG ≥ 110 mg/dL

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.85(0.36–1.95)

0. 71

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.87(0.35–2.16

0.87

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.74(0.33–2.12)

0.62

HDL-C < 40 mg/dL

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.88(0.33–2.32)

0.80

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.88(0.31–2.51)

0.82

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.89(0.30–2.69)

0.83

SBP ≥ 90th percentile

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.51(0.12–2.19)

0.36

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.50(0.18–2.13)

0.38

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.34(0. 07-1.68)

0.19

WC ≥ 90th percentile

1

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.52(0.19–1.45)

0.21

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.57(0.20–1.63)

0.30

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.53(0.19–1.50)

0.30

HOMA-IR^#

Model 1 ^*

1.00(ref)

0.95(0.29–3.11)

0.93

Model 2 ^**

1.00(ref)

0.92(0.26–3.18)

0.89

Model 3 ^***

1.00(ref)

0.97(0.28–3.72)

0.91