Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristic of the study participants between case and control groups

From: The association between ultra-processed foods intake and the odds of prostate cancer: a case–control study

Variables

Cases (60)

Controls (60)

P-value

Age (year) ^

65.5 (13.0)

60.0 (11.5)

0.003

BMI (kg/m2) *

24.8 ± 3.6

25.8 ± 3.4

0.121

UPFs (energy %)

8.3 (6.7)

6.4 (6.6)

0.311

Energy (kcal/day) *

2712.2 ± 593.5

2596.1 ± 712.7

0.334

Fiber (g/day) ^

20.1 (8.8)

23.3 (11.6)

0.187

Total fat (g/day) *

69.3 ± 37.3

54.4 ± 22.2

0.009

SFA (g/day) *

21.7 ± 8.2

18.5 ± 8.8

0.045

MUFA (g/day) ^

15.2 (8.0)

13.7 (9.3)

0.098

PUFA (g/day) ^

7.1 (3.9)

7.2 (5.5)

0.845

Ethnicity, Fars, % &

80.0

76.7

0.825

Education, % &

0.134

Illiterate and Primary

Diploma and Academic

68.3

31.7

53.3

46.7

 

Physical activity, % &

0.024

Never or Less

Moderate

High

38.3

41.7

20.0

20.0

40.0

40.0

 

Lipid medication, yes, % &

10.0

10.0

1.000

HTN medication, yes, % &

31.7

21.7

0.302

Aspirin use, yes, % &

16.7

25.0

0.369

  1. Significant values are shown in bold
  2. BMI body mass index, UPFs ultra-processed foods, SFA saturated fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA poly unsaturated fatty acids
  3. ^Using Mann–Whitney for abnormal continuous variables and values are median (IQR)
  4. *Using independent samples T-test for normal continuous variables and values are mean ± SD
  5. &Using chi-square test for categorical and values are numbers and percentage