Skip to main content

Table 4 The quality appraisal of selected articles (n = 11)

From: African immigrants’ health behaviors related to non-communicable diseases- a qualitative systematic review

Checklist for Quality Research, Joanna Briggs Institute

Addo et al. 2019

Adekeye et al. 2014

Alemu et al.2021

Babatunde-Sowole et al. 2018

Brathwaite & Lemonde, 2015

Ibe-Lamberts et al

2018

Janzon & Bolmsjö, 2013

Kaplan et al. 2013

Nicolaou et al. 2012

Simonsen et al

2015

Turk et al

2014

1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?

UN

NA

Y

N

Y

NA

NA

UN

UN

UN

UN

2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?

Y

Y

Y

UN

N

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?

Y

N

N

Y

Y

N

Y

UN

N

UN

Y

10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

  1. Abbreviations: N = no; NA = not applicable; UN = unclear; Y = yes